|
|
 |
|
Robert Runyon
|
 |
|
|
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Wendy Lee and a metaphor
Appeared in PE 30Sec 1-27-09

1.19. In defense of T.
McAfee’s creation myth, PV Runyon (www.the-patriot-svoice.org)
denies xenotransplantation; he thinks it’s an animal! No. It’s “the transplantation
of living cells, tissues or organs from
one species to another such as from pigs to humans”
(Wikipedia). R. then says that since humans
are intelligent, only a super-intelligence
could bring us into being. Possible, but
unnecessary. Intellect — like the many capacities we share with other animals — is better explained as the product of millions
of years of adaptive pressure — well evidenced in the scientific literature — and in no need of
the supernatural. Read the Jan.09 SciAm,
if you can, Mr. R. It will open your eyes.
Wendy Lynne Lee
wlee@bloomu.edu
Lightstreet (Bloomsburg)
My Answer:
Wendy,
For all your knowledge and your touted educated prowess you are lacking greatly in the demeanor of common sense. Your lack
of understanding of metaphor comparison leaves Mr. McAfee in a much better steed than yourself.
What
I was metaphorically saying is that xenotransplantation has not occurred naturally, as the immune system should be a key indicator.
With man’s dabble into transplantation of cells, tissue and organs we find that without a continuing fight to stave off the
natural demise of foreign bodies we find transplantation can not be the norm but a mere temporary fix and a fix I must add,
has a most unpleasant side effect, like living a daily dose of the loss of natural bodily functions.
As
we must all agree, appearances are not always what they are perceived. Though, you embrace the religion of Darwinism doesn’t
make it right or correct! There are far too many discrepancies that cannot and have not been addressed that leaves an abhorrent
taste to the pallet. Please explain to us poor dumb people why after all these millions of years of adaptive pressure we can
not produce one instance of any living organism presently caught in the act of change. Millions and millions of species all
around us and not one? You Darwinians also possess millions of fossils showing separate and distinct species, why hasn’t any
one provided a sequential progression.
Keep
going Wendy, you make God look better all the time.
27 jan 09 @ 7:44 pm
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Professor Wendy Lee on a triade again!
1/18/2009 appeared in 30 SEC.

1.13.What drives the
world’s McAffees to insist that species are fixed by supernatural fiat? Is it the fear that an account in which our genetic
identity is malleable threatens the notion that we’re created in the image of a god? What makes xenotransplantation, cloning,
gene therapy, gene splicing possible? Natural Selection. Biotechnology demonstrates that the concept “species” is a useful
convention, not a natural fact.
There are serious
moral questions, but they are not about whether Genesis has it right. Should we grow human organs in nonhuman animals? Should
we use nonhuman
genetic material to combat human
disease? These are the issues, Mr. M.; the sun’s long
set for creation mythology.
Wendy Lynne Lee
wlee@bloomu.edu
Lightstreet (Bloomsburg
My answer:
There
are a couple things I would like to point out in Prof. Lee’s assumptions, but first I should point out that there is no such
thing, word or event related to her deceitful use of the spelling of xenotransplantation
, as there is no such animal.
Prof.
Lee also overlooks a pertinent fact, or simply intentionally overlooks the truth, which has become quite a fad with the far
left loons.
Is
there a difference between human manipulation and a natural event, ie., Natural Selection? No. Through their own arguments
on this subject they themselves are telling us that God is a fact. Prof. Lee correctly states that man has the ability to
manipulate the species through cloning, gene therapy and gene splicing, which tells us it takes intelligence to accomplish
these things.
Therefore,
it must be reasoned that Natural Selection must be accomplished via intelligence, which then points to a controlling factor,
ie., intelligence and a governing influence. Every new breakthrough that man makes in this area of science reinforces and
points towards a higher authority.
Have
you ever stopped to ask the question, “ after all this time, eons of time, why is it that there isn’t an abundance of Natural
Selected species being observed and documented happening all around us?” Or, is it that evolution has reached its pinnacle?
Even yet there is not one instance of fossil records that has caught the transformation in a sequence. So how do you think
Prof. Lee and her left wing cohorts will spin these facts?
18 jan 09 @ 12:10 pm
Saturday, January 17, 2009
Hate and Haters

Appeared
in 30 Sec. 1/17/2009
Jim, a more fitting
question to ask your readers is not, “How will history treat
George W. Bush?”, but “How will a
war crimes tribunal judge George W. Bush?”
Danville man
Why do we as a people
endowed with so much in life to be thankful for allow people like this demean others with nothing but hate. President Bush,
like all presidents have made mistakes and errors in judgment. The one thing you can’t take away from President Bush is the
fact the country has remained safe after 9-11. This Danville
man needs to get a real life and some good old fashioned soul searching.
17 jan 09 @ 2:15 pm
Theory in progress
I have been so busy lately it is hard to respond to public issues that appear in our local paper, the Press Enterprise so
I will select those issues I wish to address in 30 Sec. and letters to the Editor and post them here in my blog spot.
1. 1.12. For a celebration
of the diversity, adaptability, and resilience of living
organisms made possible
through natural selection, see the Jan. 2009 Scientific
American. Devoted to the 150th year
of Darwin’s Origin of Species, it’s essays offer a window into how the
mechanics of environment, mutation, and reproduction produce evolutionary change — even in DNA. Like any scientific
theory, NS could in
principle be falsified. But this is strength, not weakness.
THIS is what makes a theory testable,
and hence a THEORY. A challenge for T. McAffee: READ this SciAm; SHOW me you get it; SHOW why creationism’s
even a theory —and do it without
resorting to religion. Then you get your public debate.
Wendy Lynne Lee
wlee@bloomu.edu
Lightstreet (Bloomsburg)
Answer: Miss Lee, you must come to recognize, is a real hater of anyone who believes in God, a higher authority
than herself or those who have placed themselves upon a pedestal of elitism. They fail in there own analysis of fact that
the common denominator for religion and their beliefs resides in same principal for any theory, faith!
1.
If evolution is a fact of science, why is it that they have yet to show any fossil record of any
transformation caught in what must be shown as one species into another. They can’t and won’t as there are none to date.
2.
Why is it after all this supposed progress of evolution there are not many species among us that
we can not observe going through this actual change? Why after all these millions of years have we not been able to say “
look here, here is a species that is currently in the process of evolutionary change.” Simply put, it hasn’t happened in the
past and isn’t happening now.
17 jan 09 @ 1:58 pm
|
|

|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
The Patriot's Voice -2010
|
|
|
 |